PATHS

Parents And Teachers Helping Students

Home

Our Board of Advisors

MAKE A DONATION

A Choice Trend

A Choice History

Choice Legislation

AUSTRIA

CANADA

CHILE

COLOMBIA

THE CZECH REPUBLIC

DENMARK

ENGLAND

FINLAND

HUNGARY

NEW ZEALAND

PAKISTAN

POLAND

SLOVAK REPUBLIC

SPAIN

SWEDEN

UGANDA

VIETNAM

Arizona

District of Columbia

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Illinois

Iowa

Maine

Minnesota

Ohio

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Wisconsin

Choice Resources

Choice Books

Contact Your Legislators

About us

How I Came To Choice

Contact Us

Curious Logic
Presidential hopefuls exercise school choice, but deny it to others
by Clint Bolick
The Goldwater Institute
March 22, 2007
 


There's something about our nation's capital that converts many leading Democrats to school choice. But in most cases this extends only to their own children--not to the millions of children in failing public schools.

Indeed, a nearly perfect correlation exists among Democratic presidential candidates who have exercised school choice for their own children and those who would deny such choices to other parents.

When the Clintons came to Washington, D.C. in 1993, they sent Chelsea to the private Sidwell Friends School. Two years later Mr. Clinton vetoed a bill that would have allowed low-income D.C. parents to use public funds to send their children to private schools. In a speech to the National Education Association, presidential candidate Mrs. Clinton has vowed "never to abandon our public schools" -- speaking apparently as a politician, not a parent.

John Edwards decries that "America has two school systems -- one for the affluent and one for everyone else." He should know. When he joined the U.S. Senate he sent his children to a private religious school. Mr. Edwards, however, opposes private school choice for low-income families on the curious grounds that this would "drain resources" from public schools. By such logic Mr. Edwards himself "drained" approximately $132,000 from the D.C. public schools.

There is only one candidate, Sen. Joe Biden, who has both sent his children to private school and supported school choice for others.

The mystery man is Sen. Barack Obama, who sends his child to a private school in Chicago yet once referred to school vouchers as "social Darwinism." Still, he says that on education reform, "I think a good place to start would be for both Democrats and Republicans to say . . . we are willing to experiment and invest in anything that works."

Well, school choice works. Every study that has examined the effect of school choice competition has found significantly improved performance by public schools.

Given their track records it is doubtful how many candidates will agree with Sen. Obama. But as he might say, we can always have the audacity to hope.

Mr. Bolick is president and general counsel of the Alliance for School Choice and senior fellow at the Goldwater Institute. A longer version of this article appeared in the Wall Street Journal.

 


www.paths2choice.com